Question:
For anyone 60+, what was it like being a teenager?
anonymous
2013-11-17 18:54:30 UTC
For a psychology assignment, I have to do an interview with someone 60 or over about living as a teenager with the following questions. I just need one, but it's open to all.

1. Describe social and academic life at your high school (or middle school if the interviewee did not attend high school). Were the classes hard? What classes did you take? Were there cliques of kids with some more popular, or was everyone nice to everyone else?

2. How many hours a week did you work during your teenage years? Describe your job or jobs and what it was like. Did you want to go to work?

3. How did you and your friends spend your free time? What are your best memories from this time period?

4. What was your most nagging problem as a teenager?

5. What do you see as the main difference between the teenagers of today and yourself as a teenager? What do you think of today's teenagers?

6. What was expected of you as far as being a (good) student/individual?

7. Did you have any role models at the time? How did they inspire you?

8. How did your family celebrate the holidays?

Thanks in advance!
Ten answers:
Ann
2013-11-18 05:19:36 UTC
Life was much less complicated when I was in high school (graduated in 1956) than it is today. There were no hard drugs. The worst things kids did was drink beer and smoke cigarettes. Girls wore skirts and boys wore jeans. Parents expected their children to learn what they were taught. If we got into trouble at school, you can bet we got into worse trouble at home. Corporal punishment was used (on the boys). Punishment in elementary school was staying in at recess or washing the blackboard after school. In high school, we had to write a research paper on a subject the teacher chose, which meant we had to spend time after school in the library. There was a social pecking order, just like there is today, but it didn't involve gangs. There was the usual cheerleader/social group of girls and the football player/athlete group of boys vs. the nerds/studious people. My parents demanded that I study and make good grades, so naturally I was a nerd. I did end up being valedictorian, so I guess it paid off in a way. I missed a lot of social things, however. I would never think of defying my parents, so I didn't complain. We took four years of English, three years of math, four years of history, two years of science, two years of electives (choices were Spanish, Latin, home economics) and either a sport or music. The classes were demanding but not unreasonable. I was never much good in math, because the same teacher taught it year after year, and she couldn't even work problems from the textbook on the board. Algebra was like a foreign language and never made much sense. Teachers didn't get fired for incompetence, however. The math teacher was a widow who needed to support her children, so the school just let her keep teaching. No one complained, because back then it didn't matter whether girls knew anything about math and science. The only kids who worked were those from large families who needed to help out their parents or ones whose parent had died and they helped support the remaining family. Everybody else was expected to be studious. All of the boys knew that when they reached 18, they had to enlist in the armed forces and serve two years, unless they got a deferment to go to medical school or something like that. Then after they got their degree, they were still expected to serve their country. People who refused to serve as "conscientious objectors" were ridiculed. The father of one of my friends was an objector during WWII, and he was sent to Leavenworth Prison for the duration of the war. He was never able to get a job after that because he had a federal prison record, and his wife had to work and support the family. Oddly, they were proud of what he had done while everyone else looked at him as a traitor. My parents let me be friends with his daughter, because no one else would associate with her and I felt bad for her. You asked about role models--I was a pen pal with a female dr. (very rare in those days) in Africa, and I wanted to be a medical missionary like she was. However, my father wouldn't hear of it. He said, "Nice girls don't look at naked bodies". Besides, my math scores wouldn't have gotten me into medical school. That was the end of that. I became a teacher ( a respectable occupation), even though I didn't especially like it. I worked my way up being a school psychologist and later went into private practice as a licensed psychologist. That was the closest I could come to being a dr. You asked about how we spent our free time--well, it was sort of like what was portrayed in the t.v. show, "Happy Days" if you eve watched that. We went to the pharmacy across from the school, where there was a soda fountain. Everyone got a coke and a brownie, and we sat and talked and listened to the juke box. We knew we had to be home before dinnertime, so everyone left around 5 p.m. Very few kids had cars. We walked a lot. The boys who did have cars had usually inherited their parents' old cars when a new family car was purchased (at a cost of about $2,500). It was a chore to keep the older cars running, but they were polished and loved as prize possessions. Gasoline was .25 a gallon, and if someone needed a ride, they would chip in and pay to be driven to wherever they needed to go. Television sets were a new thing, and not every family had one. I used to go to a friend's house and watch "I Love Lucy" and "The Liberace Show". I guess the most nagging problem I had was not being able to go to do things with the other kids, and being expected to study all of the time. I really didn't have any terrible things go on in my life at that time. The world was recovering from WWII, and America was considered the greatest nation in the world. Everyone felt safe and secure. Of course, it was a form of insulation. I'm sure there was a lot of racism and mistreatment of people, but it didn't occur where I lived (in west TX). We were oblivious to what was really going on. Holidays were spent doing family things. My grandparents all lived pretty far away, and we didn't travel much. I had pen pals I wrote to and friends I talked to on the telephone. Kids were a lot more secure than the ones today, because families were more intact. There weren't many single parents, nobody was rich, but there wasn't abject poverty like we have today. Everybody had a job. The people who couldn't work (like returning injured veterans) were taken care of by their families, as were the elderly. Churches did the charity work instead of organizations. Gangs didn't exist except in California and New York, and there wasn't any racial mixing. Everyone stayed in their own groups and environments. I know this is a long post, but I hope it gives you an idea of what teenagers were like 60 years ago.
Jojo
2013-11-18 10:54:12 UTC
I missed out on many carefree teenage years as i got engaged at 15 years old and married at 17 and had my first child at 18 years old. That was the pattern for many teenagers in the UK in the 1960`s.



1: I hated school. Left at 15.

2:Got a job at 15, working in the Dockyard canteen 9 hours a day. It was"ok". I Cycled about 25 miles to work and back every day.

3: Was courting, so mainly went to the cinema and for walks with my b/f. I loved horse riding and had my own pony. Best memories... We were "Rockers" and went motor biking a lot.

4:Acne!

5:Main difference. Teenagers today are generally more wordly wise.

6: Not applicable.

7:My Role model was Bridget Bardot, I wanted to look like her so badly. So did many other young girls.

8: Just the usual get togethers at Christmas.
E. M
2013-11-18 10:19:38 UTC
Number 5 for me. Here in the United Kingdom we had very little materially but did not suffer because of that. We learnt to appreciate every little thing we acquired and we thanked (profusely) anyone who bought us something, loaned us something or helped us in some practical way.



I was very shy and found having conversations very difficult, especially with people my own age or my parents age but I got on well with older people (those about the age I am now - 70) nevertheless, I had been taught to be polite and helpful and managed to do that without using too many words.



We had none of the electronic gadgets of today. I was almost a teenager when my parents bought our first small 12" black and white T.V. My parents never had a house phone and I was a mum of several children before my husband and I had one. Fortunately a public phone was not too far from our home. My first child was a teenager when he had his first computer (a Sinclair ZX81 which was not remotely like today's computers and certainly not capable of contacting people all around the world).



What I think of today's teenagers is not very good although there are exceptions. Today's youth is uncouth, filthy mouthed, lacking in manners, cannot see when help is needed but quick to yell for it when they need it themselves. They expect their parents to have permanently full wallets and do not understand the words 'no', 'not yet' or 'save for it'. In fairness though, today's youth (in U.K.) have been let down badly by society. By pandering to them we have spoilt them, by creating new style education and exams we have given them the impression that they are highly qualified yet we know that they would all fail the 11+ which we took. Education began to be dumbed down because of new technology. Once children were allowed to use calculators in maths lessons it was downhill all the way. Today's youth would be virtually incapable or functioning without 'gadgets' I'm afraid. Their brains have been 'put on hold' and I hope that, one day, the powers that be will decide that they need to be revived and used as the Good Lord intended them to be used. Electronics should be an aid for the brain not a substitute for it. Everyone should be capable of knowing how to do things the 'long way'. I still know how to sew even though I have a machine which does it for me, most of the time, and that is how all things should be.
Clarity
2013-11-18 04:06:01 UTC
I'll choose number 5. I think the major difference between teenagers of my generation and today is the availability of and resultant misuse of electronics. Bullying is so much easier than it was. Privacy has been surrendered. Conversation has been forgotten. Growing up, I did not even have a phone. I had to see my friends in person to talk with them. I was bullied, but the bullying stopped as soon as I left the school grounds. There was no internet to continue it on. My private life was just that...private. Although a secret might be revealed by a friend to a few others, it did not travel instantly all over the state or further by electronic means. Teenagers have always been nasty. Now it's just much easier.
Laurence
2013-11-18 16:21:13 UTC
1. I was a working class lad in a (inevitably) middle class selective "grammar" school. Some natural middle class assumptions such as knowing classical music left me totally out in the cold. I had always been bullied, starting at age two and a half in nursery school, so I regarded its continuance as part of the natural order of things (whereas I can see now it was basically a personality disorder on my part). It suddenly stopped at about 14, I did not know why and I still do not understand, but it was quite wonderful when it did stop. We never had a choice of classes till we were 15 and might drop sciences (I did) and at 16 when we could drop Latin for Art (I did only to find I needed to get a qualification in Latin when I decided I wanted to enter university. My best friends were into left wing politics and we discussed how the "Commonwealth" party had been invented to circumvent the wartime "electoral truce".

2. My parents ran a mum and pop hardware store. I helped out whenever I was called upon: most Saturdays and often after school during the week. This was partly due to labor shortage in WW2. Wholesalers no long delivered and I visited them in person on a bike or by train and brought back whatever I could carry. My pocket money was based on my success: it is surprising just how much a pedal cycle with a sidecar can carry, but often there were just no goods to buy, so I got nought.

3. Long bicycle rides, made enjoyable by the absence of private motoring during WW2.

4. Acne.

5. Electronic equipment and material resources generally, plus the sex revolution. I first had a girl my own age speak to me when I was 15 and I was totally nonplussed and embarassed.

6. Study hard, be obedient to all authority, and "do my bit" for the war effort (in the summer of 1943 the whole class of 14 year olds spent our "vacation" on a Gloucestershire farm, working harder than I had ever done in my life or ever have done since. UK farms at that time had a minimum of mechanical resources!)

7. Oliver Cromwell, Gladstone, David Lloyd George. Isambard Kingdom Brunel (the engineer), and John Burns, the organizer of the 1889 London Dockers' Strike (my father's great hero).

8. We didn't, except for a cozy gathering of family at Christmas.Most ot the time we just thought ourselves lucky to be alive and with something, however stodgy, to eat. And when the war did end my father was scathing about people celebrating instead of getting down to the serious business of restoring a devastated country. He was, I remember, particularly furious at the quality of the timber used to build stands for spectators along the line of the Victory Parade along Whitehall: it should have gone to rebuild bombed houses. .
robin
2013-11-18 08:27:50 UTC
I was born in 1928,in London, I was 11 when when WW2 was declared and 17 when it finished,due to the chaos on children being evacuated to safer zones a lot of schooldays were lost, I rarely went ,I stayed in London, I worked in restaurant from 12 noon till 12 at night for 30 shillings a week,food was provided 5 days a week in $s it was $6,any spare time if there were no air raids I went to the cinema,,it was terribly hard living in war torn Britain, little food, ,all commodities were i short supply but we struggled through and then 10 years of Austerity. The only holiday I ever remember was a day trip to the seaside,paid by my grandfather,this was in the days of the Great Depression,never went to high school, the legal age for school leaving in Britain at that time was 14,worked in a factory that made aeroplane components. The children of today would not believe what we went through, it was bad in the States during the late 20s and all of the 30s.
anonymous
2013-11-18 03:19:16 UTC
I'll answer No. 4: I couldn't get a girl friend. I had exactly one date in high school, and it did not go very well since I didn't have a car and we had to be driven by my father. (Not exactly germane to your question, but another thing I regret: High school girls were not allowed to dress like strippers back then. Their dresses had to be at least one inch below the knee [or was it two inches?], and they sure as hell never showed cleavage!)
?
2013-11-18 14:04:32 UTC
From what I have noticed while out and about at any given time, it appears that today's teen girls dress like what would be referred to as "hookers" in my day. My parents would have mopped the floor with me had I even attempted to leave the house in that garb.
daisy
2013-11-18 03:54:46 UTC
It was just like this.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/blast_of_the_past/



And watch the movie 'American Graffiti'
Tracer
2013-11-18 23:06:50 UTC
I like that daisy,


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...