Question:
Which do you prefer? The MASH movie or series?
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Which do you prefer? The MASH movie or series?
Twelve answers:
jonds
2010-07-07 14:03:30 UTC
The movie was much better. The series was fine for the first couple of years but got old soon after.
daisy
2010-07-07 07:13:39 UTC
The series.
Suzianne
2010-07-07 06:25:55 UTC
I liked the television series better. By the time the last episode aired, I think it had lasted a lot longer than the war.
cutsup
2010-07-07 14:37:57 UTC
i loved the movie and did not like the series. i think the movie is a great classic.



to; a staunch character-----you da man, you da man
Lumpy Taters
2010-07-07 16:54:36 UTC
No question the series was much better.
?
2010-07-07 15:18:36 UTC
I enjoyed the series.I felt more of a connection to the cast.The movie was good though.
2010-07-07 12:30:48 UTC
I liked them both
handyman
2010-07-07 12:19:56 UTC
I think they are two different animals. Although both were about Korea, the series made it clear that it was really meaning Vietnam. The book, incidentally, was not written by a peacenik; he was a hawk. I like both the movie and the series.
DeeJay
2010-07-07 08:33:55 UTC
The series. One of the best series ever. Love to watch the re-runs.



The movie was good - but there was something missing.



Actually nothing compare to Mash.

DeeJay.
2010-07-07 09:56:42 UTC
Attention: As bombs and bullets... As bombs and bullets burst around them and... And the lovable surgeons of the 4077th stitch their way... Stitch their way through humor and hijinks... I know my opinion is unpopular, but I still think the movie was better. That is all.



Robert Duvall's portrayal of Frank Burns was powerful and disturbing, whereas Larry Linville was just plain silly. Every time I think of Larry Linville I think of a TV laugh-track.



Sally Kellerman was really loopy and lascivious whereas Loretta Switt was just vapid.



Elliot Gould was a genuinely rude and crude human being whereas Wayne Rogers was a total nonentity.



Donald Sutherland seemed to be on a never-ending LSD trip (befitting the hero of a late 1960s movie) whereas Alan Alda was just a wisecracking comedian who was in love with himself.



And Gary Burghoff was a truly lovable teddybear under the direction of Robert Altman, but was just another second-banana under the various hacks who directred the TV show.



Having said that, I concede that the TV show actually improved on the movie with several terrific new characters, including Jamie Farr as the transvestite Max Klinger, David Ogden Stiers as the aristocratic Charles Winchester, Edward Winter as the paranoid CIA agent Col. Flagg ("You never saw me; I do not exist"), and Allan Arbus (husband of famous photographer Diane Arbus) as the psychiatrist Doctor Sidney Freedman.



I don't know about "Handyman"'s comment that the show was written by a hawk. It may have come from a war novel by Richard Hooke, but by the time Ring Lardner Jr. (ring-leader of the Hollywood Ten) got his hands on it, I would say the basic message was about as lefty as you can get. At least, that's the reason I always liked it.
dudleydo
2010-07-07 05:47:06 UTC
The Series, of course.
2010-07-07 06:17:54 UTC
i hate both .. i have my reasons..


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...